It’s rehashes two old issues in practice-as-research:
- can artistic work present (or be) an argument? (when I would think a more interesting question is should it?)
- what are the possibilities and limitations of peer review in practice-as-research submissions?
I was frustrated at just how little we have come since the heady days of PARIP, but the article was also a useful reminder that much important work remains to be done in advocating practice-as-research at the level of HE management, in policy, and (perhaps most importantly) how its value (particularly in relation to epistemology) might be communicated outside of its bubble.
Interesting to see the Journal of Embodied Research getting a plug when it hasn’t yet published its first volume. Screenworks (that was initially distributed through The Journal of Media Practice) has been cracking on since 2006, and to a lesser extent the International Journal of Screendance (which I co-edit with Harmony Bench) are current platforms for publishing moving-image-as-research.
I particularly like the use of quote marks around the word “published” in the last sentence.